EVALUAREA IN SISTEM PEER/REVIEW

Orice articol evaluat initial (evaluare de fond) de catre colegiul de redactie este recenzat de experti in sistemul peer/review. Expertii sunt specialisti, au o reputatie recunoscuta. Recenzia se face de catre experti fie in cadrul colegiului stiintific, fie in afara acestuia. Numele autorilor nu este cunoscuta expertilor.

Procentul de acceptare a lucrarilor este de 45% din cele trimise.

Colegiul de redactie si cel stiintific fac o prima recenzie a documentului, acesta este trimis altor 2 experti pe tema respectiva, experti care completeaza un checklist (A) si trimit sugestiile lor (B) autorilor, precum si recomandari (C) editorilor.

A.

Item Da       Nu 5 4 3 2 1 Subiectul este bine formulat, original si de actualitate, corect plasat in perspective bibliografica?           Aduce o contributie stiintifica semnificativa teoretica/practica in domeniu?           Metodologia/tehnicile aplicate, descrise si utilizate in mod corect, sunt adaptate temei alese?           Prelucrarea datelor: Datele sunt corect recoltate, prelucrate si interpretate?           Discutia si interpretarea rezultatelor confera semnificatie datelor obtinute, pe baza unor argumente solide ce decurg din parcurgerea unor rationamente logice, fundamentate si pe literatura semnificativa, analizata critic?           Calitatea prezentarii si a formei: lucrarea este echilibrata ca volum al partilor componente, are o exprimare clara si elevata, graficele si tabelele sunt sugestive si servesc asertiunilor din text?           Relevanta surselor bibliografice: referintele bibliografice sunt reprezentative, prezinta elemente de noutate, sunt suficiente si prezentate conform normelor?           Respecta principiile deontologice, regulile, normele si uzantele etice si estetice?

B. Sugestii facute autorilor

Acestea pot fi facute pe o coala de hartie si atasata formularului.

C. Recomandari pentru editori

EVALUATION IN THE PEER/REVIEW SYSTEM

Every initially evaluated article (background evaluation) by the redaction staff is reviewed by experts in the peer/review system. The experts are specialists; they have a well known reputation. The review is done by experts in or outside the scientific staff. The manuscript/document is sent to the scientific specialists, without the author being specified.

The acceptance percent of sent studies is 45%.

The redaction and scientific staff do a first review of the document then send it to two other experts on that specific theme which will fill a checklist (A) and send their suggestions to the author (B) and recommendations (C) to the editors.)

A

Item Da       Nu 5 4 3 2 1 The subject is well formulated, original and up to date, correctly placed in the bibliographic perspective?           Does it have a meaningful scientific theoretical/practical contribution in the field?           The applied methodology/techniques, described and used correctly, are adequate to the chosen theme?           Data processing: The data is correctly retrieved, processed and interpreted?           The discussion and the interpreting of the results offer meaning to the obtained data, based on solid arguments extracted from well founded logic reasoning and relevant literature, roughly analyzed?           The quality of the presentation and its form: The study is balanced from the volume of components point of view has an elevated and clear language, the graphics and tables are easy to read and are they serving the paper's assertions?           Bibliographic source relevance: bibliographic references are representative, offer new elements (novelty), are sufficient and presented according to current norms?           Does it respect the deontology principles, rules, norms and ethic and esthetic rules?

B. Suggestion for the authors

These suggestions can be written on a sheet of paper (signed) and attached to the form

C. Recommendations for the editors